01Define the scale in observable language
Write what each grade allows for exterior wear, interior wear, hardware, shape, function, odor, repair and missing components. Avoid emotional words such as perfect. If unused cannot be proven, do not use it as a grade. Publish or explain the rubric buyers will encounter.
02Create category-specific inspection zones
A bag may require corners, handles, glazing, lining and closures; footwear needs uppers, interiors, heels and outsoles; eyewear needs frame, lenses, hinges and alignment. A single universal form misses defects that matter differently by product type.
03Use consistent inspection conditions
Record lighting, dry or cleaned state and whether removable parts were installed. Inspect without beauty filters. Use close focus for scratches, coating loss, stains, cracking, deformation and repairs, then add an overview showing their scale and location.
04Classify observation type
Mark normal wear, cosmetic damage, functional issue, structural damage, repair, alteration, missing part or untested area separately. A polished surface may look better while still having underlying wear. Cleaning must not erase the history of a repaired or altered area.
05Apply limiting rules
Decide which findings cap the overall grade. A functional failure, active cracking, strong persistent odor, broken closure or material undisclosed repair may outweigh otherwise clean surfaces. Record the rule used so two reviewers can reach a comparable result.
06Write buyer-facing condition copy
Lead with category, grade date and strongest material finding. List notable wear by location, all known repairs or alterations, included accessories and untested functions. Link each important statement to a current image rather than relying on grade language alone.
07Trigger reinspection
Reinspect after cleaning, repair, photography handling, extended storage, showroom use, return or transport damage. Keep the old grade and explain the new version. A condition record is time-specific, not permanent.